Skip to main content

Security report for baltsektors.lv

SIA BALT SEKTORS · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA BALT SEKTORS is a Latvian distribution company specializing in wholesale of packaged sweets, bakery, confectionery products, chocolates, and teas. Founded in 2011, it serves the Baltic region with a focus on the Latvian market, targeting wholesalers and retail store chains. The website presents a clear product catalog with popular and new items, contact information, and social media presence limited to Facebook. The business model centers on wholesale distribution with flexible cooperation terms and nationwide delivery. Technically, the website uses modern frontend libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltsektors.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on food product distribution within Latvia and the Baltic region. Its competitive advantage lies in a specialized product range and flexible delivery options. The business model is wholesale distribution with direct sales to retail chains. The website content and product catalog indicate a small-sized enterprise with a localized market presence. The company maintains a Facebook page for social engagement but lacks broader digital marketing or analytics tools. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. Growth indicators include a product catalog with new arrivals and popular items, suggesting active inventory management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact customer trust and compliance with EU regulations.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing security headers, formal privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA BALT SEKTORS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA BALT SEKTORS
Description
Uzņēmums piegādā pārtikas produktus no Eiropas Savienības uz Baltijas reģionu. Izplatīšanas uzņēmums, kas dibināts 2011. gadā, piedāvā vairumtirdzniecību ar iesaiņotiem saldumiem, cepumiem, šokolādi, tēju un konditorejas izstrādājumiem Latvijā.
Key services
Vairumtirdzniecība, Piegāde visā Latvijā, Elastīgi sadarbības noteikumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1 slim, Fancybox, Owl Carousel, Nice Select, MeanMenu, WOW.js, jQuery UI, AjaxChimp, Form Validator, MixItUp
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product catalog.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main navigation pages.
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook only.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security.txt or incident response contact information found.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  9. Website uses modern frontend libraries but no CMS detected.
  10. No explicit security headers found in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.5.1 slim, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and other UI enhancement libraries. The site is mobile responsive and provides a clear navigation structure. No CMS or backend platform is detected from the HTML source. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization indicators. SEO is basic with meta keywords present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking tools are implemented, which limits data-driven insights. Hosting provider and server details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could be improved with SEO enhancements, accessibility improvements, and analytics integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltsektors.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltsektors.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.