Skip to main content

Security report for baltmarine.eu

BALTMARINE GROUP · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BALTMARINE GROUP is a medium-sized marine trading, supply, and service company based in Lithuania with over 15 years of experience. The group operates through three companies focusing on shipchandling, marine technical supply, specialized marine services, and engine governors overhaul. The company holds ISO 9001:2015 certification and is a member of ISSA, indicating commitment to quality and industry standards. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, providing clear business information and contact details. Technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. Overall, the website reflects a trustworthy and established business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltmarine.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets maritime industry professionals and businesses requiring marine supplies and services. Its business model is B2B, focusing on quality, transparency, and continuous improvement. The partnership with a Croatian engine specialist company expands its service capabilities. The website content and certifications support a strong market position in the Baltic region. Growth indicators include a stable team of over 20 qualified personnel and a portfolio of 20+ marine products and services. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and trust signals such as ISO certification and ISSA membership.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern CMS and plugins, reducing common vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of incident response contacts reduce the overall security maturity. No cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms are evident, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy compliance tools, and a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to meet GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO optimization for broader reach and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BALTMARINE GROUP
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BALTMARINE GROUP
Description
BALTMARINE GROUP is a group of marine trading, supply and service companies supporting maritime business daily 24/7. It includes Baltmarine Trading UAB for shipchandling and technical supply, Baltmarine Services UAB for marine services including stern tube seals and hazardous materials inventory, and PBM Baltmarine UAB for engine governors overhaul.
Key services
Marine trading and shipchandling, Technical supply of marine equipment, Marine services including repairs and hazardous materials management, Engine governors overhaul services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Elementor Pro)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused and professionally presented.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  5. Security headers are missing or not detected, representing an area for improvement.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website uses modern WordPress and Elementor technologies.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. SEO and accessibility features are basic but functional. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site uses minified CSS and JS for performance optimization. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy features are recommended to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltmarine.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltmarine.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.