Skip to main content

Security report for baltiteh.lv

Balti Tehnika Serviss | Celtniecības tehnika, Rezerves daļas, Apkope/Remonts, Noma · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Balti Tehnika Serviss is a Latvian company specializing in the sale, rental, and maintenance of construction machinery, including brands such as Hyundai, Mecalac, MST, Cifa, Clark, MB Crusher, Huddig, VEI, and Rapid. The company targets construction firms and equipment renters within Latvia, positioning itself as a regional provider of new and used construction equipment along with repair and rental services. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and the Avada theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with e-commerce capabilities and integration of marketing and consent tools such as Google Tag Manager and CookieYes. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but lack of explicit security headers and privacy policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides relevant content for its audience, though contact information and compliance documentation are limited.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltiteh.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the transportation sector, focusing on construction equipment sales and services. Its business model combines equipment sales (both new and used), rental services, and maintenance/repair offerings. The presence of well-known equipment brands enhances its market credibility. The website's content and structured data indicate a small-sized enterprise founded around 2015, with consistent branding and a clear target audience. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights. Marketing efforts include social media engagement via Facebook and use of Google Tag Manager for analytics. The company appears to maintain a localized market presence without evident subsidiaries or parent company affiliations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited formal security governance. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance efforts. To enhance security maturity, the company should implement recommended HTTP security headers, maintain up-to-date software, and provide clear security and privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including official company emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins, themes, and platform components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Balti Tehnika Serviss | Celtniecības tehnika, Rezerves daļas, Apkope/Remonts, Noma
Description
BALTI TEHNIKA SERVISS offers construction machinery, spare parts, maintenance/repair, and rental services. Brands include HYUNDAI, MECALAC, MST, CIFA, CLARK, MB CRUSHER, HUDDIG, VEI, RAPID.
Key services
new construction machinery sales, used construction machinery sales, maintenance and repair services, equipment rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Avada Theme, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes Consent, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Avada
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce site using Avada theme.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local construction equipment market.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It leverages common web technologies such as jQuery and integrates third-party services including Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance appears moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of scripts and assets. The absence of detailed hosting information limits assessment of infrastructure quality. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business model but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltiteh.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltiteh.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.