Skip to main content

Security report for baltikagroup.com

Baltika Group · Retail · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltika Group is a well-established Estonian fashion company with a history dating back to 1928. The company manages the Ivo Nikkolo brand across multiple markets, focusing on premium women's fashion with original designs and high-quality European fabrics. The website reflects a professional retail business with clear branding and consistent messaging. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks several important security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for improved compliance and protection. The WHOIS data is incomplete, lacking registrar and registrant details, which slightly reduces trust but does not negate the legitimacy of the business as presented on the site. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and credible but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baltikagroup.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltika Group operates in the retail fashion sector, targeting modern women seeking premium clothing. Their business model centers on brand management and retail operations, with a strong emphasis on quality and design. The company has a significant heritage and regional presence, managing the Ivo Nikkolo brand in three markets. The website supports multilingual content, indicating an international or regional audience. The company maintains a LinkedIn presence and provides clear contact information, enhancing business credibility. The absence of detailed WHOIS data is a concern but may be due to privacy or registry issues. No major partnerships beyond the Ivo Nikkolo brand were identified. The company appears to maintain ethical standards, as evidenced by a published Code of Ethics.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks several recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are visible. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism indicates partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to improve marketing insights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Baltika
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltika Group
Description
Baltika Group is a fashion house founded in 1928, based in Estonia, managing and operating the Ivo Nikkolo brand across three markets. They focus on original design, premium European fabrics, and high-quality production aimed at modern women.
Key services
Fashion brand management, Retail operations, Design and production of women's clothing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Contact Form 7, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Mega Addons for Visual Composer, Font Awesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust
  4. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent is missing
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers
  6. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and themes
  7. No explicit security headers detected
  8. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a flexible and widely supported platform. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements and icons. The site loads Google Fonts for typography. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content such as large images and sliders. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks beyond WordPress and its plugins. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baltikagroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baltikagroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.