Skip to main content

Security report for balticbeautyawards.lv

BALTIC BEAUTY AWARDS · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Beauty Awards is a regional initiative based in Latvia that recognizes innovation and sustainability in the Baltic beauty industry. The platform serves beauty brands and companies by providing an award system that highlights excellence in skincare, haircare, and body care products. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to its target audience of beauty industry stakeholders in the Baltic region. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Django, Bootstrap, and htmx, hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and well-positioned in its niche, but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of balticbeautyawards.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balticbeautyawards.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
90
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention balticbeautyawards.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for balticbeautyawards.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Baltic Beauty Awards operates as an important entity within the retail beauty sector, focusing on the Baltic market. Its business model revolves around awarding and promoting innovative beauty products, which helps position it as a thought leader and trendsetter in the region. The initiative is supported by partnerships with the Baltic Beauty exhibition and the E-BEAUTY.LV portal, enhancing its credibility and reach. The target customers are beauty brands seeking recognition and market differentiation. The platform's revenue streams likely include application fees and sponsorships. Growth indicators include ongoing award cycles and active engagement with industry participants. The partnership ecosystem is well-defined, with clear links to regional beauty industry stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens protect form submissions, indicating awareness of common web security practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security policy disclosures are not present, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with EU regulations and enhance transparency.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and accountability.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BALTIC BEAUTY AWARDS
Description
An initiative to celebrate innovation and excellence in the Baltic beauty industry by awarding the most innovative and sustainable beauty products in skincare, haircare, and body care sectors.
Key services
Award application processing, Industry recognition, Information dissemination about beauty innovations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.0, Google Fonts (Montserrat), htmx 1.9.10, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical and og:url https URLs)
  • CSRF token implemented for forms
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. Technical stack is modern and uses reputable libraries and frameworks.
  6. Security best practices partially implemented but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
  7. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Django as the backend framework, Bootstrap for responsive design, and htmx for enhanced interactivity. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are used for typography and analytics respectively. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services that improve performance and security. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and hreflang attributes. Accessibility is basic but functional. There is room for improvement in implementing advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with moderate technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 47/100High35 findingsView report
  2. 47/100High35 findingsView report
  3. 47/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balticbeautyawards.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balticbeautyawards.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.