Security report for baloni.lv
SIA "RĪGAS RĒVIJA" · Retail · Latvia
High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.
The website baloni.lv represents SIA "RĪGAS RĒVIJA", a small Latvian retail business specializing in party supplies, balloon decorations, carnival costumes, and event services. The company operates both physical stores in Riga and Cēsis and an online store subdomain. The website content is focused on providing a wide range of festive products and decoration services targeting general consumers planning celebrations and events. The market position is local with a clear focus on retail and event decoration sectors. Technically, the website uses basic web technologies including JavaScript and integrates multiple analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, StatCounter, and Yandex Metrika. The site lacks modern CMS indicators and shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate with no advanced frameworks detected. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation, lack of security headers, and absence of privacy or cookie policies. Security evaluation reveals no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of HTTPS and security headers significantly lowers the security score. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. However, the presence of consistent contact information and physical addresses supports business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and provides relevant business information but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and user experience. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving mobile responsiveness, and establishing security best practices.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 10/ 100 · Critical
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
- High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
- Critical
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
- High
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
- NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
- NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching baloni.lv
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 62
- Security headers
- 15
- Email security
- 75
- DNS health
- 75
- Network security
- 20
- GDPR outside view
- 10
- Average
- 43
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.
- Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
- Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
- Establish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information.
- Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- SIA "RĪGAS RĒVIJA"
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- SIA "RĪGAS RĒVIJA"
- Description
- Gaisa baloni - apdruka, kompozīcijas, dekori, rotājumi; baloni ar hēliju; lateksa un folijas baloni; karnevāla tērpi – noma un pārdošana; karnevāla maskas; svētku noformēšana, privāto un korporatīvo pasākumu dekorēšana, reklāmas objekti, Balonu Pasaule.
- Key services
- balloon printing and aeroreklāma, balloon decoration, balloon release and disposal, gifts with balloons, helium and accessories, carnival costumes and attributes, wedding decoration, children's parties, thematic events, foam figure cutting
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- moderate
Technology
- Stack
- Google Analytics, StatCounter, Yandex Metrika, JavaScript
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- basic
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- basic
Security
- Observed score
- 40/100
- Good practices seen
- No visible sensitive data exposure
- No vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, StatCounter, Yandex Metrika
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- poor
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- StatCounter, Yandex Metrika
- Marketing tools
- StatCounter, Yandex Metrika
- Transparency
- basic
Site quality
- Design
- basic
- User experience
- basic
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- basic
- Trustworthiness
- moderate
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
- WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
- No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
- Contact information including email, phone, and physical addresses clearly provided in footer.
- Website uses multiple analytics tools including Google Analytics, StatCounter, and Yandex Metrika.
- No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS status unknown.
- Content is focused on party supplies and event decoration with no adult or questionable content.
- Site design is basic with moderate navigation clarity but limited mobile optimization.
- No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
- Social media presence includes Facebook, YouTube, Google+, and Twitter links.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with baloni.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baloni.lv.