Skip to main content

Security report for bakinatajna.com

Bakina Tajna · Retail · Serbia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bakina Tajna is a small Serbian retail business specializing in traditional food products such as ajvar, jams, preserves, and sauces. The website presents a well-structured and visually appealing digital storefront, targeting consumers interested in authentic Serbian culinary traditions. The business leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and third-party widgets for social media integration and cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and transparency. Additionally, the lack of explicit contact information and security headers suggests areas for improvement in security posture and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional, user-friendly, and compliant with basic privacy standards, but the domain registration inconsistency and limited business contact details present moderate risks. Strategic enhancements in security headers, domain registration transparency, and contact information disclosure would strengthen the security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bakinatajna.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bakina Tajna operates in the niche market of traditional Serbian food products, focusing on ajvar, jams, preserves, and sauces. The business model appears to be retail and e-commerce, targeting consumers who value authentic, traditional recipes. The website's multilingual support indicates an intent to reach regional markets including Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, and English-speaking audiences. The company maintains consistent branding and product presentation, which supports a positive market position within its niche. However, the lack of publicly available company registration details and contact information limits full business intelligence assessment. The use of modern web tools and marketing integrations suggests an active approach to digital marketing and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a notable gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contact channels indicates limited preparedness for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern from a trust and legitimacy perspective, potentially impacting the overall security trustworthiness of the site.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure transparency and legitimacy of domain registration.
  4. Add explicit company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bakina Tajna
Description
Ajvar po receptu naših baka, nastao od najukusnijih crvenih paprika, i živopisne teglice džemova i slatkog, pune voća i ničeg više. Recepti koje koristimo stari su vekovima, ljubomorno ih se držimo, dok pripremu konstantno unapređujemo i prilagođavamo modernim vremenima.
Key services
Ajvar, Džemovi (Jams), Slatka (Preserves), Umaci (Sauces)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Splide.js slider, Elfsight Instagram Feed
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Finsweet Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product information.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and third-party integrations for marketing and social media.
  7. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for sliders and Elfsight widgets for Instagram feed integration. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. The presence of a cookie consent banner with opt-in functionality indicates attention to privacy compliance. Hosting is provided by Webflow, which typically offers reliable infrastructure. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO enhancements could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from additional security hardening and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bakinatajna.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bakinatajna.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.