Skip to main content

Security report for bakery.fi

Royal Bakery · Retail · Finland

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Royal Bakery is a Finnish bakery business operating an e-commerce website built on WordPress with WooCommerce and the Divi theme. The site offers bakery products with options for local pickup and online ordering, targeting a general audience interested in bakery goods. The website demonstrates a good level of content quality, design, and user experience, with mobile optimization and basic SEO features. The technical infrastructure leverages common and modern web technologies, including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Analytics for tracking visitor behavior. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, but lacks several important security headers that could enhance protection against common web threats. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information is not explicitly provided, which may affect user trust and business credibility. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency of contact information. These enhancements would strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence, reducing potential risks. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers, publishing a security policy or incident response contact, and providing clear business contact details. These steps will improve the security posture, compliance, and overall credibility of Royal Bakery's online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bakery.fi

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Royal Bakery operates in the retail bakery sector in Finland, focusing on direct consumer sales through an e-commerce platform. The business model combines online ordering with local pickup services, catering to customers seeking convenience and quality bakery products. The use of WooCommerce indicates a transactional revenue stream, likely supplemented by in-store sales. The website's design and content suggest a small-sized enterprise with a consistent brand image. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified, indicating a focused business operation. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager suggests an interest in customer behavior analytics to optimize marketing and sales efforts. However, the absence of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper insights into market positioning and growth strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and SSL properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or security incident response contacts was found, which may hinder effective handling of security incidents. The use of popular CMS and plugins requires diligent patch management to avoid vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, increasing regulatory risk. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, there is room for significant improvement to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Include explicit business contact information such as email and phone numbers to increase trust and credibility.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royal Bakery
Description
Royal Bakery appears to be a bakery business based in Finland offering bakery products and possibly e-commerce services.
Key services
bakery products, local pickup, online ordering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Analytics, Divi Theme, Font Awesome, jQuery UI
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Divi theme.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. Content is bakery-related, safe, and targeted at general audience.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
  10. No data protection officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It employs common web technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. The site loads multiple CSS and JavaScript resources, some from external CDNs such as Cloudflare and Google. Performance appears moderate with caching plugins indicated by minified CSS files. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and media queries present. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bakery.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bakery.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.