Skip to main content

Security report for baizas.lv

Stādu audzētava "Baižas" · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stādu audzētava "Baižas" is a Latvian nursery specializing in perennial plants with a large collection exceeding 1500 varieties, including phlox, astilbes, and grasses. The website targets gardening enthusiasts and customers in Latvia, offering e-commerce functionality with a shopping cart and multi-language support. The business appears to be a small retail operation with a focused market niche in horticulture. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Ruby on Rails with Hotwired Turbo and StimulusJS, and integrates monitoring tools like New Relic and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance disclosures. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baizas.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focused on horticulture and nursery plants, serving a Latvian-speaking audience. Its competitive advantage lies in a broad and specialized plant collection and an established online presence with e-commerce capabilities. The business model centers on direct sales to consumers and possibly wholesale through multiple sales channels. The website's multi-language support indicates an intent to reach a broader regional market. Contact information is transparent, supporting customer trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. Growth indicators include seasonal news and new plant introductions. The company maintains a gallery and educational content, enhancing customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens for form security, indicating basic security hygiene. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies reduces GDPR compliance confidence. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of reputable third-party analytics and monitoring tools is positive but requires regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain a robust security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stādu audzētava "Baižas"
Description
Mūsu ziemciešu kolekcijā ir vairāk nekā 1500 dažādības, tajā skaitā vairāk nekā 150 flokšu šķirnes, vairāk kā 100 astilbju šķirnes, vairāk nekā 100 dažādas graudzāles. Plašs ir akmensdārziem un kapiem paredzēto augu piedāvājums.
Key services
Sale of perennial plants, Seasonal plant news, Plant gallery and information, Multiple language support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Turbo (Hotwired), StimulusJS, Glightbox, Choices.js, Google Analytics, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails, Hotwired Turbo, Stimulus
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags
  • Secure form handling with authenticity tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multi-language support.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the page.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, emails, and physical address.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and monitoring tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No social media links found on the page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Ruby on Rails stack with Hotwired Turbo and StimulusJS for dynamic front-end interactions. It leverages CDN-hosted libraries such as Glightbox and Choices.js for UI enhancements. Google Analytics and New Relic Browser are integrated for performance monitoring and user analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and hreflang attributes for multi-language support. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baizas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baizas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.