Skip to main content

Security report for axialogistics.com

AXIA LOGISTICS · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AXIA LOGISTICS is a small business specializing in international freight forwarding services. The company positions itself as a partner for international shipping needs, targeting businesses and individuals requiring logistics solutions. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Jetpack, hosted on WordPress.com infrastructure, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site design is basic with minimal content but consistent branding. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place; however, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures to improve trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching axialogistics.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight forwarding. The domain age of over a decade supports a stable market presence. The business model is service-oriented, providing logistics solutions internationally. The website lacks detailed business information such as physical address or phone contact, which limits transparency. No certifications or trust badges are displayed. The absence of social media links suggests limited digital marketing engagement. The use of Jetpack Stats indicates some level of analytics monitoring. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company appears to maintain a straightforward, small-scale operation with a niche market focus.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a fundamental security requirement. Domain status flags clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited provide protection against unauthorized domain changes. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy information. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including phone number and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels to improve security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AXIA LOGISTICS
Description
Your partner in international freight forwarding
Key services
international freight forwarding
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Elementor, PHP, MediaElement.js
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com), WordPress.com pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small business site focused on international freight forwarding.
  2. Content is minimal with no privacy or cookie policies present.
  3. No contact phone number or physical address found on the homepage or footer.
  4. Uses WordPress with Jetpack and Elementor plugins.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with valid SSL.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage.
  9. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  10. Tracking via Jetpack Stats pixel is present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Jetpack plugin, hosted on WordPress.com infrastructure. The site uses modern web fonts and media elements but lacks advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design. SEO is basic with meta description and Open Graph tags present but no advanced SEO markup or structured data beyond minimal Open Graph. Accessibility features are basic with skip links and alt attributes on images but no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility markup. The site does not use DNSSEC and lacks security headers, indicating technical debt in security configuration. No forms or interactive elements are present on the homepage, limiting data collection and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with axialogistics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review axialogistics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.