Skip to main content

Security report for awas.com

Dubai Aerospace Enterprise · Transportation · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE) is a globally recognized aviation services company headquartered in Dubai, with over 40 years of industry experience. The company specializes in aircraft leasing, finance, and airframe MRO solutions, serving a diverse client base of over 200 customers worldwide. DAE operates through multiple international offices, including locations in Dublin, Limerick, Amman, Singapore, New York, Miami, and Seattle, positioning itself as a global leader in the aviation sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting aviation industry stakeholders, investors, and potential employees.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching awas.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
75
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DAE's business model focuses on aircraft leasing and maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services, leveraging its extensive experience and global footprint. The company maintains a strong market position with strategic subsidiaries such as DAE Capital and DAE Engineering (Joramco). Its digital presence supports investor relations, corporate governance, and career opportunities, indicating a mature and transparent business operation. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains like joramco.com, reinforcing its integrated service offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and uses security best practices such as cookie consent management and Cloudflare bot management. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not published, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear security contact channels to improve trust and incident handling.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dubai Aerospace Enterprise
Description
Dubai Aerospace Enterprise is a global aviation services company headquartered in Dubai with over 40 years of experience. It operates leasing and engineering divisions serving over 200 customers worldwide from offices in Dubai, Dublin, Limerick, Amman, Singapore, New York, Miami, and Seattle.
Key services
Aircraft leasing, Aircraft finance, Airframe MRO solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Cloudflare (implied by __cf_bm cookie)
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with categories and user control
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookie (__cf_bm)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Zoominfo
Marketing tools
CookieYes GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  4. Use of modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins
  5. Presence of official social media links enhances trust
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, supported by jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. It is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security services. The site demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance of plugins and scripts is recommended to ensure security and performance. Accessibility is basic and could be improved to meet higher standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with awas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review awas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.