Skip to main content

Security report for avis-d.lv

Sia Avis-D · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sia Avis-D operates as a small Latvian wholesale supplier specializing in high-quality fish and seafood products sourced from Atlantic fish. The company targets retail and wholesale buyers within Latvia, emphasizing freshness, natural ingredients, and compliance with EU food safety standards. Their product range includes various smoked, salted, and marinated fish products, catering to a niche market focused on quality seafood. The website serves as a digital storefront providing product information, contact details, and partnership opportunities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins for e-commerce catalog and sliders. It integrates Google Analytics and Tawk.to for analytics and live chat support, respectively. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features such as cookie consent banners or privacy policies. The design and user experience are basic but functional, with moderate mobile optimization and SEO. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic good practices like HTTPS and secure form handling but misses critical security headers and privacy compliance elements. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicates compliance gaps. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and contact information appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security posture and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing accessibility and SEO, and establishing vulnerability disclosure processes to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avis-d.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention avis-d.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for avis-d.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avis-D holds a niche position in the Latvian wholesale fish product market, leveraging quality and freshness as key differentiators. Their business model focuses on B2B wholesale distribution with an emphasis on long-term partnerships and customized client relations. The company’s use of HACCP certification and EU compliance claims supports their competitive advantage in quality assurance. Revenue streams likely derive from wholesale contracts and retail supply. The website indicates active efforts to engage partners and customers through direct contact and online ordering forms. The partnership ecosystem appears limited but focused, with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of a digital storefront and live chat suggests moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications, but lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options. No evidence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms was found. The contact forms appear to be standard with no visible advanced protections like CAPTCHA or input sanitization indicators. The use of third-party analytics and chat services introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Compliance with GDPR is questionable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to patch known vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Improve website accessibility and SEO to enhance user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sia Avis-D
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sia Avis-D
Description
Sia Avis-D is a wholesale supplier of high-quality fish products made from Atlantic fish. They offer a wide product range including various smoked, salted, and marinated fish and seafood products. The company emphasizes freshness, natural products, and compliance with EU standards.
Key services
Wholesale fish product supply, Partnerships with retailers, Delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Tawk.to live chat, Latinsoft Slider plugin, Ecommerce Product Catalog plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based small business site for fish product wholesale.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is used.
  6. Use of third-party analytics and live chat tools present moderate user tracking.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. Basic SEO and accessibility features present but could be improved.
  9. No visible terms of service or security policy pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 5.2.1 with plugins such as Ecommerce Product Catalog and Latinsoft Slider. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site loads multiple JavaScript files from embed.tawk.to for live chat functionality. The site is served over HTTPS, but no advanced security headers are detected in the HTML content. Performance appears moderate with some caching (Comet Cache plugin indicated). Mobile optimization is basic with responsive meta viewport tag but no advanced responsive design features detected. SEO is basic with canonical tags and hreflang attributes for Latvian, Russian, and English languages. The site lacks structured data (JSON-LD) and advanced accessibility features. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avis-d.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avis-d.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.