Skip to main content

Security report for avenei.lv

SIA AVENEI · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avenei is a Latvian small business specializing in natural, healthy fruit-based ice creams without dairy products. The company operates an e-commerce platform built on WordPress and WooCommerce, offering products such as ice creams on sticks, in cups, and filled pancakes. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and security.txt files for incident response. Overall, the business appears credible with clear contact information, customer testimonials, and a loyalty program.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avenei.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention avenei.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13
Employees
0
Customers
13
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for avenei.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets health-conscious consumers in Latvia seeking vegan and dairy-free frozen desserts. Its business model combines online retail with home and workplace delivery, supported by a loyalty program to encourage repeat purchases. The market position is niche but well-defined, focusing on natural ingredients and convenience. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a trustworthy customer experience. The company leverages third-party marketing and payment services but does not expose sensitive data or suspicious domains.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security and analytics plugins. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy. No security.txt file or dedicated security contact is found. The absence of a cookie consent banner may pose GDPR compliance risks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, consent mechanisms, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA AVENEI
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA AVENEI
Description
Avenei is a Latvian company specializing in healthy, natural fruit-based ice creams without dairy products. They offer ice creams on sticks, in cups, and filled pancakes. The business emphasizes natural ingredients, vegan options, and convenient delivery.
Key services
Natural fruit ice creams, Vegan and dairy-free frozen desserts, Home and workplace delivery, Loyalty program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, SelectWoo, MakeCommerce payment gateway, Omnisend marketing, YITH WooCommerce Ajax Navigation, Loyalty Points Rewards plugin
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Omnisend
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling natural fruit ice creams.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local consumers.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected on homepage.
  5. Good use of marketing and analytics tools including Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics.
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response contact information.
  7. Contact info includes company email and physical address in Riga, Latvia.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. Site includes customer testimonials and loyalty program indicating business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses popular plugins for payment processing, marketing automation, and loyalty rewards. The tech stack includes jQuery, SelectWoo, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small e-commerce business but has room for modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avenei.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avenei.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.