Skip to main content

Security report for avearthviz.com

Avearth · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avearth is a small interior design studio based in Ludza, Latvia, offering interior design services and training courses. The website serves as a portfolio showcasing their projects and provides contact information for potential clients. The business targets individuals and companies interested in interior design and related education. Technically, the website is built on Squarespace, leveraging modern web technologies including Typekit fonts, Google Fonts, and Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks security headers and privacy policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content appears genuine and professional. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avearthviz.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avearth operates in the niche interior design sector with a focus on local clientele in Latvia. Their business model revolves around providing design services and educational courses, likely generating revenue through project contracts and training fees. The website's portfolio and Instagram presence support brand visibility and client engagement. The lack of detailed company registration data and privacy policies suggests room for maturity in corporate governance and compliance. The use of Facebook Pixel indicates an intent to leverage digital marketing and retargeting strategies. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The company appears to be a small, independent studio with a focused market approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy detected, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces tracking but no clear user privacy controls. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish an incident response contact or page to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Avearth
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avearth
Description
Avearth is an interior design studio based in Ludza, Latvia, offering design and training services related to interior design.
Key services
Interior design, Design training (3ds Max course)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Typekit fonts, Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, Weglot translation
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Weglot translation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional interior design studio portfolio
  2. Uses Squarespace CMS and hosting
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found
  4. Contact info is clearly provided including email and phone
  5. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
  6. No security headers detected
  7. Uses Facebook Pixel for tracking
  8. No forms detected on main page
  9. No terms of service or incident response info found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing modern web fonts from Typekit and Google Fonts, and includes Facebook Pixel for analytics and retargeting. It uses Weglot for translation services, indicating multilingual support capability. The site loads scripts asynchronously and defers non-critical resources, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, though could be enhanced with more comprehensive metadata. No custom backend or frameworks beyond Squarespace are detected. Hosting is via Squarespace CDN, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avearthviz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avearthviz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.