Skip to main content

Security report for autovip.lv

Autoserviss un Veloserviss Piņķos · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website autovip.lv represents a small local business specializing in automotive and bicycle repair services located in Piņķi, Latvia. The business offers a range of services including engine repairs, tire changes, suspension adjustments, and welding work. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Brizy page builder, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of Google Tag Manager suggests some analytics and tracking capabilities. Security posture is limited based on available data, with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a professional and relevant service offering but lacks some critical security and compliance features. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, adding privacy policies, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autovip.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Autovip.lv operates as a local service provider in the transportation sector, targeting vehicle and bicycle owners in the Piņķi region. The business model is service-based, focusing on repair and maintenance. The website's market position is that of a specialized local provider with a clear service portfolio. The inclusion of a Facebook page link supports customer engagement and trust. Revenue streams likely derive from direct service fees. The company appears to have a focused customer segment without evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators and parent company information are not available. The website content and branding are consistent and professionally maintained.

Security posture

The current security posture of autovip.lv is basic. The site uses HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is provided. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces tracking but with minimal user tracking level. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, formalized privacy compliance, and incident response readiness to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autoserviss un Veloserviss Piņķos
Description
Autoserviss. Ritošās Daļas Remonts. Dzinēju Remonts. Riepu Maiņa. Savirzes Regulēšana. Metināšanas Darbi. Veloserviss
Key services
Autoserviss, Ritošās Daļas Remonts, Dzinēju Remonts, Riepu Maiņa, Savirzes Regulēšana, Metināšanas Darbi, Veloserviss
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Brizy page builder, Chaty plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Chaty plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local automotive and bicycle repair service in Piņķi, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language and professionally presented.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  4. No contact emails or physical addresses explicitly found; only phone number in meta description.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Brizy builder plugins.
  7. Includes Facebook social media link as trust indicator.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Brizy page builder plugins, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site appears mobile optimized with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics available. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins and lack of security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autovip.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autovip.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.