Skip to main content

Security report for autostrada-a2.pl

Autostrada Wielkopolska SA · Transportation · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autostrada Wielkopolska SA operates and manages toll highways in Poland, specifically the A2 route connecting Poland and Germany. The company provides toll collection services, traveler information, and infrastructure management. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and targets drivers and transport companies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and scripts, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although formal security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting a high legitimacy score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autostrada-a2.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds an important position in Poland's transportation sector as a toll road operator. It maintains subsidiaries to manage different aspects of highway operations. The business model focuses on infrastructure management and toll revenue. The website supports customer engagement through multiple contact channels and social media. The presence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance with GDPR. The company leverages digital tools like Google Tag Manager and mailing plugins for marketing and analytics. The site’s content and structure reflect a mature digital presence aligned with its business objectives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of reputable third-party libraries and plugins is noted, though continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities is recommended. The absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, enhancing compliance. No critical security issues were detected, but adding incident response contacts and security disclosures would strengthen the security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security with input validation and anti-CSRF measures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Autostrada Wielkopolska SA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autostrada Wielkopolska SA
Description
Lokalizacje punktów poboru opłat na A2 znajdziesz w serwisie internetowym spółek Autostrada Wielkopolska. Trasa to najważniejsze połączenie Polski z Niemcami.
Key services
toll collection, road infrastructure management, travel information, customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, AcyMailing plugin, WPML multilingual plugin, PWA for WP plugin, Micromodal, Lodash
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
AcyMailing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained.
  2. Content is focused on toll road services and traveler information.
  3. Multiple contact channels including phone, email, and online forms are available.
  4. Multilingual support with Polish and English versions.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and plugins.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms.
  7. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.5, using modern JavaScript libraries such as Lodash and Micromodal, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. It supports multilingual content via WPML and implements PWA features for improved user experience. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets and fonts, indicating attention to design and branding. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are present, including ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autostrada-a2.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autostrada-a2.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.