Skip to main content

Security report for autoskolsky-ombudsman.cz

Autoškolský ombudsman · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Autoškolský ombudsman' serves as an independent advisory and mediation portal focused on driving schools and related stakeholders in the Czech Republic. It is a joint project of two professional associations representing driving schools, providing free expert advice, mediation services, and legislative input collection. The site targets driving school students, instructors, examiners, and operators, positioning itself as a niche expert resource within the transportation and education sectors. The business model is non-profit, funded initially by sponsorships and planned contributions from driving schools. Technically, the site employs a modern but basic technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics. The design is professional and mobile-optimized with clear navigation and consistent branding. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness, although the site content and partner affiliations support legitimacy. Tracking via Google Analytics is present, but privacy compliance is minimal. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autoskolsky-ombudsman.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project is positioned as a specialized non-profit advisory and mediation service within the Czech driving school ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in its backing by major professional associations, providing credibility and access to stakeholders. The business model relies on sponsorships and contributions rather than commercial revenue. Target customers include driving school students, instructors, examiners, and operators. Growth potential depends on expanding funding and increasing awareness among driving schools. The partnership ecosystem includes Asociace autoškol ČR and Profesní společenství autoškol ČR, which enhances legitimacy and outreach. The website content and structure reflect a focused mission with clear service offerings and educational resources.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing security contact information. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit user consent mechanisms are present. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autoškolský ombudsman
Description
Společný projekt Asociace autoškol (AAČR) a Profesního společenství autoškol (PSA ČR). Nezávislý odborný portál pro uchazeče o řidičské oprávnění, žáky autoškol, profesní řidiče, provozovatele autoškol a školicích středisek, učitele v autoškole, zkušební komisaře a další osoby působící v autoškolství.
Key services
Help for driving school students regarding their rights and complaints, Assistance to driving schools in exercising rights against state authorities, Mediation and expert legal opinions in disputes, Collection of legislative improvement suggestions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 4, jQuery 3.3.1, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Ionicons, Magnific Popup, WOW.js, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (based on URL scheme)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Site uses multiple external libraries and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. Content is focused on advisory and mediation services for driving schools in Czech Republic.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  7. Site branding is consistent and professional with partner logos displayed.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; security posture could be improved.
  9. No forms with visible email or phone input fields detected in the main HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a standard Bootstrap framework with jQuery and several UI libraries such as Font Awesome and Ionicons. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive and has a clean, professional design. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization techniques detected. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or enhanced features. SEO is minimal with missing meta keywords and descriptions. No CMS or hosting provider information was found. The site uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts, which is good practice. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be improved with modern SEO, accessibility, and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autoskolsky-ombudsman.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autoskolsky-ombudsman.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.