Skip to main content

Security report for autoskla-stavaric.cz

Autoskla Stavarič s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autoskla Stavarič s.r.o. is a small, established Czech company specializing in automotive glass services including repairs, replacements, tinting, and coding, serving primarily the Prostějov and Litovel regions. The website reflects a professional local business with clear service offerings and physical locations. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Noty.js, and Google Analytics, but some components like jQuery are outdated, posing potential security risks. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms and includes a cookie consent banner, though lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or advanced protections. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain legitimacy verification and reduces trust. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its business purpose but would benefit from improved security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autoskla-stavaric.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector focusing on automotive glass services with a business history dating back to 1992. It maintains partnerships with insurance companies and local suppliers, positioning itself as a trusted regional service provider. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely from direct customer sales and insurance claim handling. The website supports customer engagement through contact forms and showcases physical locations with embedded maps. The partnership ecosystem includes local SEO and web design firms. Growth indicators are limited but the long-standing presence and insurance partnerships suggest stable operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and uses an outdated jQuery version which could expose vulnerabilities. No privacy policy or incident response information is provided, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are missing, which could be a risk for data handling and breach management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration information or ensure domain registration data is publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and data protection officer contact to improve security culture and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Autoskla Stavarič s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autoskla Stavarič s.r.o.
Description
Autoskla Stavarič offers complete automotive glass services including repairs, replacements, tinting, coding, and headlight renovation. They serve Prostějov and Litovel areas and handle insurance claims onsite.
Key services
autoskel repairs, autoskel replacement, headlight renovation, glass tinting, glass coding, air conditioning check
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Noty.js (notifications), Modernizr, Google Analytics (gtag.js), CSS stylesheets, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Sklik Retargeting (configured but empty)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content.
  5. Physical addresses for two locations provided with embedded Google Maps.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Use of outdated jQuery version (1.9.1) which may pose security risks.
  8. Google Analytics implemented with consent management.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.9.1, Noty.js for notifications, and Modernizr for feature detection. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking with consent management implemented. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical URLs. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, enhancing mobile responsiveness, and implementing advanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autoskla-stavaric.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autoskla-stavaric.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.