Skip to main content

Security report for autoservissjugla.lv

Autoserviss Jugla · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autoserviss Jugla is a small local automotive service provider based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in vehicle repair, diagnostics, tire services, and maintenance for light and off-road vehicles. The company emphasizes professional service with experienced staff and modern equipment, targeting vehicle owners in the Riga region. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, with a moderate level of technical sophistication and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The presence of customer testimonials and clear contact information enhances business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps that should be addressed. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image for a local automotive service business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autoservissjugla.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Autoserviss Jugla operates in the transportation sector, providing essential vehicle repair and maintenance services. The business model focuses on direct service delivery to local customers, leveraging experienced technicians and modern equipment. The company maintains an active online presence with social media integration and customer testimonials, supporting customer trust and engagement. The website content and structure suggest a stable small business with a focus on quality service rather than aggressive marketing or expansion. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company was founded around 2015, consistent with the website's published date. The business targets individual vehicle owners and possibly small fleet operators in Riga.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which should be regularly updated to avoid vulnerabilities. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure program. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with basic security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance security readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autoserviss Jugla
Description
Autoserviss veic visa veida vieglo un apvidus auto, remontdarbus un diagnostiku neatkarīgi no auto markas. Profesionāls riepu serviss.
Key services
Auto repair, Diagnostics, Tire service, Vehicle maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Fonts, LazySizes, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via gtag)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  5. Security headers are missing; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Customer testimonials present, enhancing trust.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a common and well-supported platform. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Lazy loading of images is implemented via LazySizes, improving performance. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No hosting provider information was found in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no evident advanced SEO techniques.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autoservissjugla.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autoservissjugla.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.