Skip to main content

Security report for autopay.pl

Autopay · Transportation · Poland

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autopay.pl is a well-established Polish payment solutions provider founded in 2015, offering a range of services including online payments for e-commerce, fleet management solutions, and prepaid phone top-ups. The company targets both business and individual customers primarily in Poland and Europe, positioning itself as a reliable and certified payment service provider with regulatory endorsements from NBP and KNF. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Vue.js and Bootstrap, integrated analytics, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy policies are comprehensive and accessible, but explicit contact information and security incident response details are not readily found on the main site. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and optimized for mobile users, supporting Autopay's market position as a credible payment service provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autopay.pl

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Autopay operates in the transportation and finance sectors, providing payment processing and fleet services. Its business model revolves around enabling seamless online payments and automated toll collections, targeting e-commerce merchants and fleet operators. The company maintains a multi-country presence with dedicated regional domains, indicating strategic geographic expansion. Certifications from national financial authorities enhance its credibility. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement, with calls to action for service registration and app downloads. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for European and global markets, reflecting a broad operational footprint.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent management aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a strong privacy and security culture. Use of reputable analytics platforms and tag managers is evident, with no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and additional header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and demonstrate security commitment.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve usability for all users and meet regulatory standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autopay
Description
Niezawodne płatności online dla e-sklepów, nowoczesne usługi dla flot, rozwiązania dla masowych wystawców faktur i wiele więcej.
Key services
Online payments for e-shops, Fleet services, Mass invoice issuers solutions, Prepaid phone top-ups, Automatic toll payments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Bootstrap 5, Splide.js slider, Google Tag Manager, Consentmanager.net, Piwik/Matomo analytics, Plausible analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused analytics and tag management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Piwik/Matomo, Plausible
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
ads.autopay.pl
Tracking pixels
Piwik/Matomo, Consentmanager.net, GAConnector, Plausible
Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net, Plausible
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with granular user control.
  3. Comprehensive privacy policy available in Polish.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page HTML.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. Presence of certifications (NBP, KNF) indicates regulatory compliance.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. Good mobile optimization and responsive design.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Vue.js for reactive UI components, Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, and Splide.js for sliders. Analytics are managed via Google Tag Manager, Piwik/Matomo, and Plausible, with consent management handled by Consentmanager.net. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and adaptive elements. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading of images. The CMS or backend platform is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility features. Hosting details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autopay.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autopay.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.