Skip to main content

Security report for automester.dk

AutoMester · Transportation · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AutoMester.dk represents Denmark's largest network of automotive workshops, with nearly 400 service centers nationwide. The company focuses on providing local car servicing and repair through a trusted network of skilled mechanics. The website reflects a mature business with a long domain history dating back to 1997, indicating established market presence and credibility. The business model centers on connecting car owners with local workshops, emphasizing convenience and quality service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching automester.dk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as the largest automotive service network in Denmark, targeting car owners seeking reliable local repair and maintenance. The website integrates multiple third-party advertising and analytics platforms, suggesting a data-driven marketing approach. The presence of subdomains like shop.automester.dk and fordelskunde.automester.dk indicates an ecosystem supporting e-commerce and customer loyalty programs. The business leverages partnerships with major ad networks and tracking services to optimize customer engagement and advertising effectiveness.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, reflecting a baseline security and privacy posture. Anti-CSRF cookies and session management cookies are in place, indicating attention to common web security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are publicly available, which could be a gap in security transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AutoMester
Description
Danmarks største netværk af dygtige mekanikere med næsten 400 værksteder i hele Danmark, offering car servicing and repair.
Key services
Car servicing, Car repair, Local workshop network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.0.0, jQuery Validate 1.16.0, Flowbite 1.7.0, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Use of anti-CSRF cookies (.AspNetCore.Antiforgery)
  • Use of secure session cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik Pro
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adform, Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Piwik Pro, TikTok, Reddit, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or in metadata.
  3. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising services are integrated.
  4. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website is well-branded and professionally designed with good SEO metadata.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. HTTPS is enabled but DNSSEC is not configured.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but somewhat dated technology stack including jQuery 3.0.0 and Flowbite 1.7.0 for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Hosting and domain registration are stable and consistent with the business profile. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by updating libraries and improving caching strategies. Accessibility features are basic but present.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with automester.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review automester.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.