Skip to main content

Security report for autoin.cz

AUTO IN · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AUTO IN is a well-established automotive business based in the Czech Republic, founded in 2001. The company specializes in the sale and servicing of new and used vehicles, offering a broad portfolio of automotive brands including Ford, Hyundai, Volvo, Kia, Škoda, Peugeot, and Mazda. Their services extend to authorized servicing, vehicle buyback, car rental, and operational leasing, positioning them as a comprehensive automotive provider in their market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation tailored to their target audience of consumers and businesses seeking automotive solutions. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern JavaScript technologies and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Piwik PRO. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates moderate performance, although some accessibility features could be improved. Hosting appears to be managed by a Czech provider consistent with the domain registration data. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of tracking scripts, which is positive. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and no published privacy policy or terms of service, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy with a long registration history and consistent registration details matching the business claims. Overall, AUTO IN's website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures, security header implementation, and clearer contact information to improve compliance and user confidence. Strategic improvements in these areas will strengthen their security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autoin.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention autoin.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for autoin.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AUTO IN operates in the transportation sector with a focus on automotive sales and services. Their market positioning is strong within the Czech Republic, supported by partnerships with multiple major automotive brands and a diversified service offering including leasing and rentals. The business model is centered on direct vehicle sales, after-sales servicing, and financial services such as operational leasing. The company targets both individual consumers and corporate clients, leveraging a multi-channel approach including physical sales locations and online presence. Growth indicators include a broad vehicle catalog and active marketing via social media and analytics-driven campaigns. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for leasing, motorcycle sales, truck sales, and car rental, indicating a comprehensive automotive group structure. Strategic observations suggest a mature business with opportunities to enhance digital trust and compliance to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of asynchronous script loading to reduce performance impact. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no accessible privacy policy or terms of service. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not found, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts necessitates regular audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical controls to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers on the website for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AUTO IN
Description
Široká nabídka nových a ojetých vozů za atraktivní ceny. Prodej, servis, výkup, autopůjčovna a operativní leasing.
Key services
New car sales, Used car sales, Authorized servicing, Vehicle buyback, Car rental, Operational leasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Piwik PRO, Cookie Script
Frameworks
Turbo (turbo.es2017-umd.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured for automotive sales and services.
  2. Multiple automotive brands and services are prominently featured.
  3. Extensive use of tracking and analytics scripts indicates focus on marketing and user behavior analysis.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via cookie-script.com.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet; contact info may be on other pages.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with Turbo framework for enhanced page loading and navigation. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing platforms indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and adaptive layouts. Hosting is consistent with the domain registrar's location, suggesting localized infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts improving user experience. However, the lack of detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary solution, which may require dedicated maintenance resources. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autoin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autoin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.