Skip to main content

Security report for autofink.at

Albert Fink Ges.m.b.H. · Transportation · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Albert Fink Ges.m.b.H. operates as a reputable automotive dealership and service provider specializing in Volkswagen, Skoda, and Audi vehicles, primarily serving the Südoststeiermark region in Austria. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including new and used car sales, vehicle servicing, financing consultation, and accessories. Their market position is that of an authorized dealer with a strong local presence and positive customer ratings. Technically, the website is built on the Plone CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Select2, and integrates Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a trustworthy domain registration. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with moderate to good security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policy publication, and incident response contact information would enhance compliance and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autofink.at

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Albert Fink Ges.m.b.H. holds a solid position in the automotive retail sector within Austria, focusing on well-known automotive brands. Their business model revolves around direct vehicle sales and after-sales services, targeting local customers in the Südoststeiermark region. The company leverages partnerships with brand manufacturers and third-party platforms such as dasweltauto.at for used car listings and porscheinformatik.com for workshop bookings, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The presence of social media channels and structured customer ratings suggests active customer engagement and brand building efforts. The business appears medium-sized with a focused regional market approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via OneTrust, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the defense-in-depth level. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could limit rapid response to security events. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust introduces potential supply chain risks if not regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but with room for enhancement to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and ensure they are up to date.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Albert Fink Ges.m.b.H.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Albert Fink Ges.m.b.H.
Description
Autohaus Fink is a car dealership and service partner specializing in Volkswagen, Skoda, and Audi vehicles, serving the Südoststeiermark region in Austria.
Key services
New car sales, Used car sales, Vehicle servicing and maintenance, Test drives, Financing consultation, Vehicle accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Plone CMS, FontAwesome, Swiper.js, Select2, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Plone
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust with a visible banner and scripts.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone number and physical address.
  5. Social media presence is integrated with links to Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube.
  6. Technical stack is modern and based on Plone CMS with common JS libraries.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No visible forms in the provided HTML snippet; contact forms may exist on other pages.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
  10. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Plone CMS, a robust and secure content management system, combined with modern front-end libraries like FontAwesome, Swiper.js, and Select2 for enhanced UI/UX. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, while OneTrust manages cookie consent, indicating compliance efforts. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and APIs such as Google Maps. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. However, the lack of explicit security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for technical improvement. The infrastructure appears stable but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility domains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autofink.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autofink.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.