Skip to main content

Security report for autoeder.cz

AutoEder s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AutoEder s.r.o. operates as a reputable automotive dealership specializing in Toyota and Lexus vehicles, offering new and used cars, authorized servicing, financing, leasing, and additional automotive services primarily in the Czech Republic. The company maintains a strong market position with a professional online presence, targeting car buyers and owners seeking premium automotive brands. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel, alongside comprehensive cookie consent management to ensure GDPR compliance. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA on forms, and security headers, contributing to a robust security posture. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data and a formal security policy page limits full trust verification. Overall, the site is well-designed, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting the company's credibility and customer engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autoeder.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention autoeder.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for autoeder.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a multi-channel approach combining direct vehicle sales, aftersales services, and financial products like leasing and insurance to diversify revenue streams. Its market positioning is reinforced by strong brand affiliations with Toyota and Lexus, supported by active social media engagement and customer testimonials. The business model focuses on regional dominance with a medium-sized operational scale. The website content and structure reflect a customer-centric approach with clear navigation and comprehensive service offerings. Strategic partnerships with major social platforms and advertising networks enhance marketing reach. Growth indicators include active promotions and a well-maintained blog showcasing industry news and company updates.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and anti-bot measures such as Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent is managed via a professional third-party solution, ensuring compliance with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident handling transparency. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by displaying certifications or compliance badges where applicable.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AutoEder s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AutoEder s.r.o.
Description
Toyota and Lexus car dealership and service provider offering new and used vehicles, servicing, financing, leasing, and additional automotive services.
Key services
New vehicle sales, Used vehicle sales, Authorized servicing and maintenance, Leasing and financing, Vehicle modifications and accessories
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Cookies, CookieYes Consent Management, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent management with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite PRO, MonsterInsights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and rich media.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. Multiple tracking and advertising pixels are used with consent management.
  5. Contact information is available via phone and a detailed contact form with GDPR consent.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. Website uses modern technologies and WordPress CMS.
  10. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks and multiple analytics and marketing integrations. Performance is moderate with caching and lazy loading implemented. Mobile optimization and accessibility are excellent, ensuring a broad user reach. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb navigation. The absence of hosting provider details limits infrastructure assessment. Technical risks are low but depend on continuous maintenance of third-party components and security updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 47/100High33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autoeder.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autoeder.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.