Skip to main content

Security report for autocentr.lv

Autocentrs · Transportation · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autocentrs is a Latvian automotive service company established in 2016, offering vehicle diagnostics, maintenance, repairs, and spare parts sourcing with fast delivery through partners. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, supporting multilingual content in Latvian and Russian. The site is mobile optimized and includes clear contact information, privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR, and a cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled, though security headers are not explicitly detected and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy local business with a solid digital presence.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autocentr.lv

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector as a small local auto service provider targeting vehicle owners in Latvia. Its business model focuses on providing quality automotive repair and maintenance services with competitive pricing and customer convenience. The presence of multilingual support and partnerships for spare parts delivery indicates a customer-centric approach. The website content and contact details reinforce the company's legitimacy and market position. No direct competitors or parent/subsidiary relationships are identified from the site data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, indicating attention to basic security and privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses well-known WordPress plugins, which should be kept updated to mitigate risks. Lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Add incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve security communication.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to latest versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Alat Auto
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autocentrs
Description
Serviss dibināts 2016. gadā, ērta piebraukšana, blakus sabiedriskai transports, klientu uzgaidāmā zāle, rezerves daļu meklēšana un ātra piegāde caur mūsu sadarbības partneriem.
Key services
Auto diagnostics, Maintenance and repairs, Spare parts sourcing and delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper.js, Bootstrap, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and forms.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, email, physical address, and contact form.
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  9. Site content is professional and relevant to automotive repair services.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multilingual capabilities via WPML and uses Contact Form 7 for user inquiries. Frontend technologies include jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and Bootstrap for responsive design. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. No advanced hosting or CDN details are evident from the HTML. The site lacks explicit security headers and advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a focus on privacy and simplicity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autocentr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autocentr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.