Skip to main content

Security report for autobrava.lv

Autobrava Motors · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autobrava Motors is a Latvian automotive dealership specializing in premium brands such as CUPRA, Ducati, and Volkswagen, offering petrol, hybrid, and electric vehicles along with servicing. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence built on WordPress, utilizing modern technologies like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, providing a good user experience with clear branding and professional design. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website's content and brand partnerships indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site reflects a medium-sized business with a focus on automotive sales and services in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autobrava.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an official dealer and service partner for notable automotive brands, targeting vehicle buyers and service customers in Latvia. Its business model revolves around vehicle sales and maintenance, leveraging brand partnerships to establish market credibility. The use of extensive analytics and marketing tools suggests a focus on customer acquisition and retention. Absence of explicit contact details on the main page may indicate reliance on in-person or direct contact channels. The website's consistent branding and compliance with GDPR through Cookiebot reflect a mature approach to digital marketing and privacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a detailed cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and formalized incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers on the website for better user trust and support.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autobrava Motors
Description
Autobrava Motors is an official dealer center for CUPRA and Ducati, and a Volkswagen service partner offering petrol cars, hybrids, and electric vehicles.
Key services
Vehicle sales (CUPRA, Ducati, Volkswagen), Vehicle servicing and maintenance, Sales of petrol, hybrid, and electric vehicles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap Datepicker, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, JivoChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No privacy policy page URL explicitly found but detailed cookie consent dialog present.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities in HTML.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  10. Good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins such as NinjaTeam CF7 Multi-Step Pro and Honeypot for forms, and uses jQuery and Bootstrap Datepicker for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, advertising, and chat support, indicating a complex but standard modern web infrastructure. No hosting provider information was discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autobrava.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autobrava.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.