Skip to main content

Security report for auri.gay

Non-profit · Austria

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website auri.gay represents a personal and community-focused presence for an individual known as ␇-707570 or aurora, a robot-dog entity who actively volunteers at the German non-profit Queer Lexikon and engages with various social platforms. The site serves primarily as a contact and social hub rather than a commercial or corporate business, targeting a general audience interested in queer community and personal expression. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted by OVH sas, and shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or CMS usage. The site lacks HTTPS status information and security headers, which limits its security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing privacy risks but also limiting interactivity. From a security perspective, the domain is registered with OVH and protected against unauthorized deletion or transfer, indicating a reasonable level of domain security. However, the absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers, as well as missing privacy and cookie policies, represent compliance and security gaps. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, and the content is safe for general audiences. Overall, the site is a well-maintained personal presence with good content quality and moderate technical implementation but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protection for visitors.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auri.gay

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website functions as a personal and community engagement platform rather than a commercial enterprise. It leverages multiple social media and communication channels to maintain contact and presence within niche queer and hobbyist communities. The business model is informal, focusing on volunteering and social interaction rather than revenue generation. The target audience is general and community-oriented, with no direct monetization or commercial services offered. Partnerships include the German NPO Queer Lexikon, reflecting a non-profit sector involvement. Growth indicators are limited due to the personal nature of the site, and the partnership ecosystem is primarily social and community-based.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with domain registration protections in place but lacking in web security best practices. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security reduces the site's resilience against common web threats. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting readiness for security events. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible policies or consent mechanisms. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a personal site but not for commercial or sensitive data handling.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of an individual known as ␇-707570 or aurora, a robot-dog entity who volunteers at the German NPO Queer Lexikon and collects Pokémon Trading Cards.
Key services
volunteering at Queer Lexikon, community engagement via multiple social platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Personal website with rich contact and social media presence
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found
  3. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status provided
  5. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
  6. Multiple external links to social and community platforms
  7. WHOIS data consistent and domain secured with transfer/delete prohibitions
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a static HTML/CSS site hosted on OVH infrastructure. It uses no detectable CMS or JavaScript frameworks, indicating low technical complexity. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques observed. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are limited to basic semantic HTML and CSS styling. The site could benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, SEO enhancements, and security hardening. The lack of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection but also limits insights into user behavior.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auri.gay. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auri.gay.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.