Skip to main content

Security report for augluserviss.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Augļu Serviss is a Latvian retail business specializing in the daily delivery of fresh fruits to restaurants, stores, offices, and households. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on fresh fruit distribution. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Vue.js and Axios, with integration of Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS and CSRF tokens implemented, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism but no dedicated privacy policy or terms of service pages found. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures and clearer compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching augluserviss.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets retail customers including restaurants, stores, offices, and households in Latvia, focusing on fresh fruit delivery. The business model is direct retail distribution with a likely local or regional market focus. The website content and cookie consent indicate a legitimate operation, but absence of contact details and corporate information reduces transparency. The use of Google advertising and analytics tools suggests active marketing efforts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The company appears to be a small-sized retail entity with a consistent brand presence online.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF protection tokens, indicating basic security awareness. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and YouTube embeds, which increase tracking but also introduce potential privacy concerns. The lack of visible privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Conduct a security audit of third-party scripts and minimize tracking where possible to enhance user privacy.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and security contact channels to improve trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Svaigākie augļi katru dienu restorāniem, veikaliem, birojiem un mājsaimniecībām
Key services
Fresh fruit delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, jQuery, Axios, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CSRF token meta tag
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
YouTube tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Use of modern frontend technologies (Vue.js, Axios)
  6. Google Analytics and YouTube tracking present
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js framework with supporting libraries such as jQuery and Axios. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS chunks asynchronously and uses modern module preload techniques. The HTML is well structured with meta tags for viewport and charset. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical assets. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The site lacks visible HTTP security headers and detailed server configuration data. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with augluserviss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review augluserviss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.