Skip to main content

Security report for audemarspiguet.com

Audemars Piguet · Retail · Switzerland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

89/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Audemars Piguet is a prestigious Swiss luxury watchmaker with a rich heritage dating back to 1875. The company specializes in crafting high-end mechanical watches and maintains a strong global brand presence. Their website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies such as Adobe Experience Manager, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides rich multimedia content to engage affluent consumers and watch enthusiasts. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the brand's reputation and website quality. Strategic recommendations include publishing a formal security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audemarspiguet.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
89

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the luxury retail and manufacturing sectors, targeting affluent customers and collectors worldwide. Their business model focuses on exclusive product offerings, brand storytelling, and after-sales services. The website supports this with detailed product showcases, news, and event microsites. Partnerships and related domains support brand initiatives such as anniversaries. The company maintains consistent branding and professional content, reinforcing its market position as a leader in luxury horology. The digital presence is sophisticated, leveraging analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and conversion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and privacy compliance via OneTrust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure channels represents a gap in transparency and readiness communication. The WHOIS data absence raises minor concerns but is mitigated by the overall site professionalism. Enhancing security documentation and providing direct security contacts would improve the security posture and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Maintain updated WHOIS information to improve domain transparency and trust.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Audemars Piguet & Cie SA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Audemars Piguet
Description
Audemars Piguet is a Swiss luxury watch manufacturer founded in 1875 in the Vallée de Joux, specializing in high-end mechanical watches with a focus on craftsmanship and heritage.
Key services
Luxury watch sales, After-sales services, Brand storytelling and heritage promotion
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (inferred from component naming), Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Teads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. Strong brand presence and consistent luxury branding
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is uncommon for a major brand domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, indicating a robust enterprise CMS platform. It uses modern JavaScript frameworks (likely Vue.js) and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with lazy loading of images and videos. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present. The technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with fast loading times and SEO best practices. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the presence of Adobe Helix RUM suggests advanced performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audemarspiguet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audemarspiguet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.