Skip to main content

Security report for attrans.com

Attrans Ltd · Transportation · Malta

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Attrans Ltd is a Malta-based international transport and forwarding company specializing in logistics services between Malta, Europe, and North Africa. Established in 1976 as a family business, it offers a range of services including groupage transport, temperature-controlled and refrigerated transport, as well as project and exceptional load transport. The company leverages a network of local agents across multiple European countries and North Africa to provide reliable and efficient transport solutions. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a clear focus on transportation and forwarding services, targeting businesses requiring cross-border logistics solutions. Technically, the website is built on an IBM Domino CMS platform, utilizing common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Slider, and PhotoSwipe for UI enhancements. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with a clear navigation structure and professional design. However, the performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism despite the use of tracking technologies, and no published security or incident response policies. No email contacts are provided, only a phone number, which may limit direct communication channels. Overall, the security posture is average with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. The overall risk assessment indicates a legitimate and established business with a professional online presence but with moderate privacy and security compliance gaps. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving privacy compliance to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching attrans.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Attrans Ltd holds a strong market position as a leading family-owned transport and forwarding company with over four decades of experience. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive local agent networks across key European and North African markets, enabling comprehensive logistics coverage. The business model focuses on specialized transport services including temperature-controlled and exceptional load transport, catering to industries such as food, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, textiles, and high-grade goods. Revenue streams likely derive from freight forwarding contracts and logistics services. The company targets B2B customers requiring reliable international transport solutions. Growth indicators include a diversified service portfolio and established partnerships. The website content and structure suggest a stable operation with moderate digital maturity and a focus on traditional transport sectors.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Attrans Ltd's website is moderate. The use of HTTPS and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts are positive indicators. However, the absence of critical security headers (CSP, HSTS), lack of cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible incident response or security policies indicate gaps in compliance and security culture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide direct security contact channels, which may hinder incident reporting and response. Compliance with GDPR is partial, given the lack of cookie consent and privacy policy details. Enhancing security best practices and privacy compliance would reduce risk and improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Add and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Attrans Ltd
Description
International transport to and from Malta, Europe and North Africa. From weekly groupage transport to refrigerated transport to exceptional loads. A leading family business since 1976 with extensive local networks in UK, France, Benelux, Germany, Austria, Italy, Spain and Tunisia.
Key services
International transport, Forwarding, Weekly groupage transport, Temperature-controlled transport, Refrigerated transport, Project and exceptional transport
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Slick Slider, PhotoSwipe, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical and og:url https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on transport and forwarding services between Malta, Europe and North Africa
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite use of tracking scripts
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Use of IBM Domino CMS is uncommon but consistent with legacy enterprise systems
  6. Contact phone number is prominently displayed and consistent across pages
  7. No email addresses found in HTML content
  8. No social media links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an IBM Domino CMS platform, which is less common but suitable for enterprise environments. It uses a combination of jQuery and related UI libraries for frontend interactivity, along with Slick Slider and PhotoSwipe for media presentation. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is average, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The lack of modern frontend frameworks or progressive web app features indicates some technical debt and modernization opportunities. Security-related technical risks include missing security headers and absence of cookie consent mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with attrans.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review attrans.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.