Skip to main content

Security report for ats.lv

Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ats.lv appears to be a Latvian service provider specializing in rental of lifting equipment and tower services, targeting local businesses or individuals requiring such services. The site uses modern web technologies including Vue.js and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Crazy Egg. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security configurations such as HTTP security headers are not evident, and no WHOIS data was retrievable to verify domain registration details, limiting trust assessment. Overall, the site presents basic content and moderate technical implementation but requires improvements in privacy, security, and business transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ats.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model is service rental focused on lifting and tower equipment, likely serving a niche market in Latvia. The website content is primarily in Latvian, indicating a local target audience. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, and certifications suggests a small-sized enterprise with limited digital maturity. Marketing efforts include tracking and retargeting via Facebook and Google tools, indicating some investment in customer acquisition. The absence of privacy and security policies may expose the business to compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or content.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response contacts, or security policies. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance with data protection regulations. No WHOIS data was available to verify domain legitimacy, which is a concern for trustworthiness. Overall, the site should enhance its security posture by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide security contact information.
  4. Verify and monitor WHOIS data to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Improve business transparency by adding clear contact information and company registration details on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be related to rental services for lifting equipment or tower services in Latvia.
Key services
Lifting equipment rental, Tower services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Tawk.to chat widget, Crazy Egg
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
Tawk.to chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. Website uses modern JavaScript framework Vue.js.
  3. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are present.
  4. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No explicit contact information or business registration details found in content.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in provided data.
  7. Content is in Latvian language targeting local market.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Website performance and mobile optimization appear moderate to good.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and includes several marketing and analytics scripts such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Tawk.to chat widget, and Crazy Egg. The site preloads fonts and scripts for performance optimization. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations appear basic. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. Technical debt is not evident but the absence of security best practices and privacy compliance indicates areas for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ats.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ats.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.