Skip to main content

Security report for atriumljungberg.se

Atrium Ljungberg · Real Estate · Sweden

High risk. 16 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atrium Ljungberg is a leading Swedish real estate company specializing in the development and management of vibrant urban environments across major cities such as Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö, and Uppsala. The company focuses on mixed-use developments that combine office spaces, residential areas, retail, and cultural offerings to create sustainable and attractive city districts. Their market position as one of Sweden's largest publicly listed real estate firms is supported by a comprehensive digital presence and investor relations resources. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, HubSpot forms, Cookiebot for consent management, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Application Insights. The site is built on the Episerver CMS platform and demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA on forms, and manages cookie consent effectively. While explicit security headers are not fully evident, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear GDPR adherence and detailed cookie declarations. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly experience with extensive content relevant to its business domain. The domain registration details align well with the company's claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and maintaining up-to-date third-party scripts to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

16 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atriumljungberg.se

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
70
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atrium Ljungberg operates in the real estate sector with a focus on urban development and property management. Their business model revolves around creating mixed-use city districts that enhance quality of life and business productivity. The company targets investors, tenants seeking office and residential spaces, and partners interested in sustainable urban projects. Their competitive advantage lies in their scale, presence in key Swedish growth markets, and commitment to sustainability and innovation. Revenue streams likely include leasing, property sales, and service offerings. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with marketing and analytics providers and actively engages with stakeholders through investor relations and content marketing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities were identified in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively but should consider additional hardening measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance server-side validation and CSRF protections on all forms to prevent abuse.
  5. Maintain ongoing privacy compliance monitoring and update cookie declarations as needed.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atrium Ljungberg
Registration number
556175-7047
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atrium Ljungberg
Description
Atrium Ljungberg utvecklar attraktiva och levande stadsmiljöer med ett blandat innehåll i Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö och Uppsala.
Key services
Office space leasing, Residential property development, Urban district development, Sustainability and city innovation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, HubSpot Forms, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Application Insights, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
HubSpot, Azure Application Insights
Platforms
HubSpot CMS (forms), Episerver (Find API)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Apsis, Apsis Lead
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations via Cookiebot.
  3. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with transparent privacy links.
  4. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  10. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical infrastructure using Episerver CMS and integrates multiple modern technologies such as jQuery, Swiper.js for UI components, and HubSpot for marketing automation. Analytics and tracking are comprehensive, leveraging Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Hotjar, and social media pixels. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, but mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed. The use of Cookiebot ensures dynamic cookie consent management. Technical risks are minimal but include potential exposure from third-party scripts if not regularly maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atriumljungberg.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atriumljungberg.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.