Skip to main content

Security report for atria.fi

Atria · Retail · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atria is a leading Finnish food company specializing in fresh meat, fish, poultry, and ready meals with over 120 years of experience. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, recipes, and corporate content targeting consumers, professionals, and retail partners. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks (likely Vue.js), integrates Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, indicating a well-instrumented infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is high, supported by consistent WHOIS data and strong brand presence. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and user-friendly, suitable for its large enterprise status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atria.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atria.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for atria.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atria holds a dominant position in the Finnish food retail and manufacturing sector, offering a wide range of meat and ready food products. Their business model includes direct online sales via subsidiary domains and extensive consumer engagement through recipes and tips. The company leverages social media effectively and maintains a strong partnership ecosystem. The website supports multiple audience segments including consumers, professionals, and retail customers, indicating a diversified revenue stream. The digital presence aligns with their market leadership and brand strength.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent, and telemetry monitoring via Microsoft Application Insights. Security headers are present, and no critical vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could be improved to enhance security culture and incident handling readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for all users.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atria
Description
Atria on Suomen johtava ruokatalo, joka tarjoaa laajan valikoiman tuoreita liha-, kala-, kana- ja kasvistuotteita sekä herkullisia valmisruokia. Yli 120 vuoden kokemuksella Atria tuo suomalaisten ruokapöytiin makuelämyksiä aina grillihetkistä arjen kiireisiin.
Key services
Fresh meat products, Ready meals, Recipes and cooking tips, Online meat shop (lihakauppa.fi)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (inferred from data-v- attributes), Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Microsoft Application Insights, Typekit fonts
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Custom CMS or platform (not explicitly identified)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of Application Insights for telemetry
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent messaging.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanism.
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  5. Active social media integration and marketing.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via forms.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) with modular scripts and asynchronous loading for performance. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates advanced marketing and privacy management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Typekit fonts for branding consistency. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in media delivery and script loading. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atria.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atria.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.