Skip to main content

Security report for atp.com

Veryon · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Veryon is a specialized provider of aviation maintenance software aimed at improving aircraft uptime through a comprehensive technology platform. The company appears to be a small-sized business founded in 2018, targeting aviation industry professionals and organizations. The website is built on HubSpot CMS and integrates various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4 and Facebook Pixel. The technical infrastructure is modern and moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atp.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Veryon operates in the transportation sector, specifically aviation maintenance software, offering a B2B SaaS platform. The company leverages HubSpot for marketing and content management, indicating a focus on inbound marketing strategies. The domain registration and website content are consistent, supporting legitimacy. The lack of explicit contact information and compliance documents suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory adherence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain attacks. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Tracking technologies are present, but privacy compliance is insufficient due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility, including dedicated security and support contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veryon
Description
Veryon helps the aviation industry get more uptime for aircraft with a better technology platform to manage everything from maintenance to manuals.
Key services
Aviation maintenance management software, Technology platform for maintenance and manuals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Cloudflare DNS, Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Forms, Slick Slider, jQuery
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and focused on aviation maintenance software.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers is not explicitly visible in the provided content.
  4. Uses HubSpot CMS and marketing tools extensively.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  8. Tracking and analytics scripts from Google and Facebook are present.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on HubSpot CMS with domain registration via GoDaddy and DNS managed by Cloudflare. It uses modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries and marketing analytics tools. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. The use of HubSpot forms suggests structured data collection but no explicit form fields or contact forms were identified in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can be improved in security and compliance aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.