Skip to main content

Security report for ateliers.org

Les Ateliers de maîtrise d’œuvre urbaine de Cergy Pontoise · Real Estate · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Les Ateliers de maîtrise d’œuvre urbaine de Cergy Pontoise is a well-established non-profit organization based in France, specializing in organizing international workshops focused on urban planning and design. With over 30 years of experience, they engage students, young professionals, and local stakeholders to collaboratively address urban challenges. Their website reflects a professional and content-rich platform that supports their mission and outreach. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, hosted by OVH sas. The site is mobile-optimized and has a moderate performance profile. However, there are gaps in security best practices such as missing DNSSEC, lack of security headers, and absence of published privacy and cookie policies, which impact compliance and security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF protection in forms, but lacks explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data confirms a long-standing domain registration consistent with the organization's history, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is credible but would benefit from improved security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ateliers.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ateliers.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
0
Customers
21
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ateliers.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong position in the niche of urban planning workshops, leveraging partnerships with reputable public and private entities. Their business model is non-profit and educational, targeting urban professionals, students, and researchers globally. The presence of multiple partners and sponsors indicates a robust ecosystem supporting their activities. Their revenue streams likely include workshop fees, memberships, and sponsorships. The website content and structure support their mission effectively, though the absence of privacy and cookie policies may affect user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The use of HTTPS and CSRF tokens are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies represent gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could delay response to security incidents. The use of third-party analytics without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns. Overall, the organization should prioritize implementing security headers, DNSSEC, and transparent privacy and security policies to enhance their security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data collection.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including dedicated contact channels.
  5. Review and improve user consent mechanisms for analytics and tracking to align with privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Les Ateliers de maîtrise d’œuvre urbaine de Cergy Pontoise
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Les Ateliers de maîtrise d’œuvre urbaine de Cergy Pontoise
Description
Les Ateliers is a non-profit organization organizing international workshops focused on urban planning and design, aiming to develop collective ideas addressing city planning challenges. They engage students, young professionals, and local stakeholders in various workshops worldwide.
Key services
International urban planning workshops, Publications and synthesis documents, Events and seminars, Membership area for members
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by domain and scripts loaded via HTTPS)
  • CSRF token present in language selection form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on urban planning workshops.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates user tracking but no visible consent mechanism.
  5. Multiple reputable partners and sponsors are displayed, enhancing trust.
  6. No phone numbers found with clear company contact context.
  7. Contact email is provided in footer: contact@ateliers.org.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  9. Domain is old and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ateliers.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ateliers.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.