Skip to main content

Security report for atbuildings.lv

AT Buildings SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AT Buildings SIA is a Latvian small business specializing in machine plastering and related construction finishing services. The company emphasizes quality materials, professional German plastering equipment, and timely project delivery. Their website targets local construction clients and highlights an individual approach with on-site consultations and partner pricing. The business has been operating since 2014 and maintains a modest online presence including a Facebook page. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, hosted via Amazon CloudFront CDN, and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are implemented for visitor tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atbuildings.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Latvian real estate and construction sector, focusing on specialized plastering services. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting construction companies and property owners requiring machine plastering and painting. The market position is local and niche, with competitive advantages including use of high-quality materials and professional equipment. Revenue streams likely derive from contracted plastering projects. The website content and social media presence suggest a small but established business with steady operations since 2014. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited but the company maintains a consistent brand presence online. Strategic observations include the need to enhance digital trust signals and compliance documentation to support business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, which is a significant compliance gap for EU-based businesses. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AT Buildings SIA
Description
AT Buildings SIA provides machine plastering services using high-quality materials and professional German plastering equipment, emphasizing timely delivery and individual client approach with consultations on-site and favorable pricing for long-term partners.
Key services
Machine plastering, Plastering, Painting
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage inferred from canonical URL (https://www.atbuildings.lv/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian language targeting local construction clients.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  4. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content.
  6. Uses Mozello CMS with Amazon CloudFront CDN for hosting.
  7. Includes embedded YouTube video and image gallery.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, leveraging jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox 3 for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. No advanced frameworks or platforms detected. The technical stack is typical for small business websites but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations. The site lacks visible security headers and formal privacy mechanisms, which are technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but basic, suitable for a small local business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atbuildings.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atbuildings.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.