Skip to main content

Security report for astratex.nl

Programia s.r.o. · Retail · Netherlands

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Astratex.nl is a specialized e-commerce retailer focusing on lingerie and swimwear, targeting a mature consumer audience primarily in the Netherlands and surrounding European markets. The business emphasizes a large customer base with over 2.4 million satisfied customers, offering fast and free product exchanges and next-day delivery services. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content relevance, supporting a strong market position in the retail lingerie sector. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is moderate due to the absence of an explicit privacy policy and terms of service in the provided content. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching astratex.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
72
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Astratex operates as a large-scale online retailer specializing in lingerie and swimwear, leveraging a direct-to-consumer e-commerce model. The company benefits from a strong brand presence and a wide product range, supported by efficient logistics enabling next-day delivery. Partnerships with payment processors like Adyen and advertising networks such as Criteo and RTB House enhance its operational and marketing capabilities. The business targets mature consumers interested in quality lingerie and swimwear, with a focus on customer satisfaction and service convenience. The absence of explicit privacy and terms documentation suggests potential areas for compliance enhancement. The company appears to be a subsidiary or product of Programia s.r.o., a Czech-based software and e-commerce solutions provider, indicating a solid backing in technology and business operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, categorizing cookies into necessary, preferences, statistics, and marketing. However, some standard security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content Security Policy are not explicitly detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The integration of multiple third-party tracking and advertising services increases the attack surface and privacy considerations. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found, indicating a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but can be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and Content Security Policy (CSP) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses, to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance with GDPR and other relevant regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Programia s.r.o.
Description
Lingerie en badmode in de maten 60/A - 120/H, 2.400.000 tevreden klanten, snel en gratis online artikelen ruilen, volgende dag bezorgd
Key services
Online sales of lingerie and swimwear, Free and fast product exchanges, Next day delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Clarity, Cookiebot, Google Fonts (Inter), Manifest for PWA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo, RTB House, Nativo
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform specializing in lingerie and swimwear.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Multiple external marketing and tracking services are integrated.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet.
  6. Security headers partially present; HTTPS enforced.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is mature but not explicit adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. The site includes a manifest for progressive web app capabilities and uses custom JavaScript modules for enhanced e-commerce tracking. Performance is moderate with some preloading of scripts and stylesheets. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with astratex.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review astratex.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.