Skip to main content

Security report for astratex.hr

Astratex · Retail · Croatia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Astratex.hr is an established e-commerce retailer specializing in lingerie, swimwear, and related apparel, targeting B2C customers primarily in Croatia and surrounding regions. The company has a stable market presence with over 15 years of brand history, offering a broad range of products from functional to fashionable undergarments and swimwear. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and basic security headers present, but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, and WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with business claims. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for enhancements in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching astratex.hr

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Astratex operates in the retail sector focusing on lingerie and swimwear, leveraging an e-commerce business model. The company targets mature consumers interested in fashion and functional undergarments. Its market position is that of a regional leader with a stable customer base and a broad product portfolio. Revenue streams are primarily from online sales, supported by partnerships with payment processors like Adyen and advertising networks such as Criteo and RTB House. The company employs advanced marketing and tracking tools to optimize customer engagement and retargeting. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable advertising and consent management providers, enhancing operational efficiency and compliance. Growth indicators include multi-country domain presence and consistent branding. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy policies and security disclosures to strengthen customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. Basic security headers are present, but the absence of advanced headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the lack of published security policies and incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Compliance gaps include missing explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce platform but would benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation to mitigate risks and improve customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Astratex
Description
Astratex je jaka i stabilna tvrtka koja već više od 15 godina zadovoljnim kupcima dostavlja proizvode od grudnjaka do kupaćih kostima u trendu, pa sve do zavodljivog rublja, funkcionalne i sportske odjeće.
Key services
Online sales of lingerie, swimwear, functional and sportswear
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, nouislider, Inter font from Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Media.net
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo, Media.net, RTB House
Tracking pixels
GTM, Glamipixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Nativo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform specializing in lingerie and swimwear.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed user controls.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. Security headers are basic but HTTPS is enforced.
  9. Advertising and tracking services are present but managed with consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. The site employs CSS and JavaScript minification and preloading for performance. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is Logomedia d.o.o., a known provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic, indicating potential for improvement. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site uses structured data for product impressions and promotions, enhancing search engine visibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with astratex.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review astratex.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.