Skip to main content

Security report for associazionealiseo.org

Associazione Aliseo · Non-profit · Italy

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Associazione Aliseo is a small Italian non-profit organization dedicated to cultural, social, and educational activities. The website serves as a platform to promote their initiatives and engage with the local community. The organization targets individuals interested in cultural promotion and social engagement within Italy. The business model is typical of non-profits, focusing on community service rather than commercial revenue. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Iubenda for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR adherence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, reflecting a good security posture for a small non-profit. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with a moderate AI security and compliance score of 77. The lack of WHOIS transparency due to privacy protection is common and justified for this type of organization. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching associazionealiseo.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Associazione Aliseo operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on cultural and social initiatives in Italy. Its market position is local/regional, serving community members interested in cultural promotion. The organization leverages digital tools to communicate and engage with its audience but does not appear to have commercial revenue streams. The website content and structure indicate a stable presence with consistent branding and good content quality. The use of standard web technologies and compliance tools suggests a moderate level of digital maturity. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates awareness of GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by adding explicit security governance documentation and incident handling contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Associazione Aliseo
Description
Associazione Aliseo is a non-profit organization focused on cultural, social, and educational activities in Italy. It targets community members interested in cultural promotion and social engagement.
Key services
Cultural events, Social initiatives, Educational programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Iubenda Cookie Solution
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query failure or privacy protection
  3. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard tracking tools
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. No terms of service page detected
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Contact information is available via contact form and email
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  10. Website content is culturally focused and safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a popular and well-supported CMS and theme combination. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Iubenda for cookie consent management, indicating integration with modern marketing and compliance tools. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses CDN services for performance optimization. The performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with associazionealiseo.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review associazionealiseo.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.