Skip to main content

Security report for asaimnieks.lv

SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks is a Latvian company specializing in professional property management and maintenance services primarily focused on residential multi-apartment buildings in Riga. The company manages approximately 40 properties and offers services including technical maintenance, renovation planning, and resident representation. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets property owners and managers in the local market. The business model centers on providing comprehensive property management solutions with a local focus. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, with integration of Google Maps API for property location visualization. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks some accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, there is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating a minimal user tracking approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration analysis, but the website content and contact details appear legitimate and consistent with a small local business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a local property management company but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency measures to improve its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asaimnieks.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asaimnieks.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for asaimnieks.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on property management services in Riga, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in localized expertise, comprehensive service offerings including technical maintenance and renovation planning, and a clear customer focus on residential property owners. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through property management fees. The target customers are residential property owners and associations seeking professional management. The company manages around 40 properties, indicating a small but established market presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a credible market position. The lack of privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and trust-building.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing regulatory risks. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy concerns but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks
Description
SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks piedāvā profesionālus īpašumu pārvaldīšanas un apsaimniekošanas pakalpojumus Rīgā. Kvalitatīva daudzdzīvokļu ēku apkalpošana.
Key services
Dzīvojamo ēku apsaimniekošana, Inženiertehnisko tīklu un ēkas konstrukciju uzraudzība, Iedzīvotāju interešu pārstāvniecība, Renovācijas un tehniskās uzlabošanas plānošana, Teritoriju uzkopšana un uzturēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Maps API usage with HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. No privacy policy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, physical addresses, and a contact form.
  4. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information is provided.
  5. Technical stack is modern using Next.js and React with Google Maps integration.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework, Next.js, which supports server-side rendering and optimized performance. Integration with Google Maps API enhances user experience by displaying managed property locations. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and asynchronous JavaScript loading to improve load times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be enhanced for better inclusivity. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags including description and keywords. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of assets and caching strategies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asaimnieks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asaimnieks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.