Skip to main content

Security report for artisjp.lv

SIA ARTIS JP · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA ARTIS JP is a Latvian company specializing in grain and agricultural crop cultivation alongside real estate leasing, operating since 1998 with headquarters in Liepāja. The company has a modest market presence focused on local agricultural production and leasing residential and office properties. Their business model integrates agricultural production with real estate management, supported by government subsidy projects for agricultural machinery acquisition. Technically, the website employs legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.4.2 and uses Google Analytics for tracking, indicating a basic digital maturity level. The site is accessible over HTTPS but lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, such as privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate but weakened by outdated libraries and missing security best practices. Overall, the website presents a legitimate small business with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artisjp.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the agriculture and real estate sectors, targeting local clients in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its established presence since 1998 and participation in government subsidy programs, which supports its agricultural machinery and production capabilities. Revenue streams likely include crop sales and real estate leasing. The website content and contact information support a transparent business operation. However, the lack of modern digital marketing and privacy compliance tools suggests limited investment in digital transformation. Partnerships appear limited to the website developer (websoft.lv). Growth indicators include expansion of agricultural land and machinery modernization. Strategic observations recommend enhancing digital presence and compliance to improve market trust and operational efficiency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.4.2) exposes the site to known vulnerabilities, increasing risk. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, suggesting limited formal security governance. No visible vulnerabilities like exposed credentials or SQL injection are detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires urgent updates to libraries and implementation of security best practices to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Improve website accessibility and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and SEO performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "ARTIS J.P."
VAT number
LV 40003402933
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA ARTIS JP
Description
SIA ARTIS JP is a company engaged in grain and other agricultural crop cultivation and real estate leasing, established in 1998 with headquarters in Liepāja, Latvia. The company operates agricultural machinery and has expanded its agricultural production and land management across several Latvian municipalities.
Key services
Grain and agricultural crop cultivation, Real estate leasing (residential and office spaces), Agricultural machinery acquisition and operation
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.4.2, Colorbox jQuery plugin, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content available.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain email and phone numbers.
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries poses security risks.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  6. Basic SEO and accessibility features present but could be improved.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy technologies including jQuery 1.4.2 and the Colorbox plugin, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site uses basic HTML and CSS with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile devices. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Technical debt is evident due to outdated libraries and lack of modern security practices. Modernization opportunities include upgrading the tech stack, improving mobile responsiveness, and implementing SEO best practices to enhance visibility and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artisjp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artisjp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.