Skip to main content

Security report for artemide.de

Artemide S.p.A. · Retail · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Artemide S.p.A. is a well-established Italian company specializing in the design and manufacturing of high-end lighting products. The website showcases a broad range of collections including design and architectural lighting solutions, emphasizing innovation, sustainability, and collaboration with renowned designers and architects. The company targets architects, designers, retailers, and consumers seeking premium lighting solutions. The digital presence is mature, featuring modern technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Google Analytics, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security practices include cookie consent management and anonymized analytics data, though explicit security headers and incident response information are not published. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns but the website's professional presentation and consistent branding support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is secure, compliant with privacy regulations, and professionally maintained.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artemide.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Artemide holds a strong market position in the premium lighting sector, leveraging design innovation and sustainability as key differentiators. Their business model combines product manufacturing with project-based lighting solutions and e-commerce capabilities. The company maintains a global footprint with extensive social media engagement and offers tools like product configurators and store locators to enhance customer experience. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, likely via contact forms. The brand's trust is reinforced by warranty offerings, a code of ethics, and comprehensive privacy policies. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not currently undermine the company's market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS usage implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. Cookie consent mechanisms are robust, allowing users to opt-in for targeting cookies, and Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization and restricted data processing. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Enhancing transparency around security frameworks and incident response would strengthen the overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and enforce HTTPS site-wide with HSTS.
  4. Consider providing direct company contact emails or verified phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Artemide S.p.A.
VAT number
IT00846890150
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Artemide S.p.A.
Description
Artemide is a company specializing in design and manufacturing of lighting products, offering collections such as Design, Architectural Indoor and Outdoor, and INTEGRALIS® Collection. They emphasize innovation, sustainability, and collaboration with leading architects and designers.
Key services
Lighting product design and manufacturing, Project lighting solutions, Online store and store locator, Configurator tool for product customization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Owl Carousel 2.2.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in for targeting cookies
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • Restricted data processing enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by cookie names)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on design, architecture, and product presentation.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user options.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form is available.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
  6. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with brand.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  10. Good accessibility features implemented (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack including Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Owl Carousel for interactive sliders. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are employed for analytics and marketing purposes with privacy-conscious configurations. The site demonstrates good accessibility practices with ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and optimized image usage. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artemide.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artemide.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.