Skip to main content

Security report for arpik.cz

ARPIK OSTRAVA s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARPIK OSTRAVA s.r.o. is a Czech architectural and engineering firm established in 2008, specializing in comprehensive project documentation for civil, industrial, and residential buildings, including engineering activities and author supervision during construction. The company serves clients seeking professional architectural and engineering services primarily in the Czech Republic. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and related plugins, demonstrating a moderate to good level of technical maturity and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the website presents a professional image with clear contact information and related group companies, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arpik.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on architectural and engineering project services. It maintains a medium-sized market presence with a clear business model centered on service provision. The presence of related subsidiaries offering geological, ecological, and consulting services suggests a diversified group structure. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, targeting clients in need of construction project documentation and consulting. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance perception. The company benefits from a consistent brand and established domain age, supporting trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses for transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ARPIK OSTRAVA s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARPIK OSTRAVA s.r.o.
Description
Architektonická a projekční kancelář, která se zabývá komplexním zpracováním všech stupňů projektové dokumentace pozemních staveb, včetně zajištění inženýrské činnosti a následného autorského dozoru při realizaci.
Key services
Architectural and urban studies, Investment intentions and feasibility studies, Project documentation for zoning and building permits including engineering activities, Project execution documentation, Author supervision during realization, Interior design proposals and projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.3, Yoast SEO 26.0, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Ubuntu), Essential Addons for Elementor, Happy Elementor Addons, Category Ajax Filter Pro
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with English alternate.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No security or incident response policies are published.
  6. Technical stack is modern and based on WordPress with Elementor builder.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and Elementor plugins.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Website is safe with no adult or questionable content.
  10. WHOIS data supports domain legitimacy and business consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.8.3 with Elementor 3.32.3 and several supporting plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. The use of Google Fonts and jQuery is standard. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) implemented. Hosting is likely provided by Wedos, consistent with WHOIS registrar data. There is no evidence of heavy analytics or tracking scripts, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. The technical stack is well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arpik.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arpik.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.