Skip to main content

Security report for arosbostad.se

Besqab · Real Estate · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Besqab is a Swedish real estate developer specializing in sustainable, high-quality housing projects primarily in the Stockholm and Uppsala regions. The company offers a range of residential properties including apartments and small houses, targeting home buyers interested in new production homes. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, and a cookie consent management system, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and business credibility, supported by transparent contact information and trust signals such as detailed cookie policies and integration with reputable third-party services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arosbostad.se

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Besqab holds a strong position in the regional real estate market, focusing on sustainable housing developments. Their business model revolves around property development and sales, with a clear emphasis on quality and environmental considerations. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Lime Technologies and Cookie Information to enhance user experience and compliance. The website's content and structure suggest a customer-centric approach, providing detailed project information, viewing schedules, and educational content about buying new production homes. Besqab's integration with major marketing and analytics platforms indicates active engagement in digital marketing and customer insights. The presence of multiple contact channels and a newsletter subscription form supports ongoing customer relationship management and lead generation.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. The use of third-party scripts is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS suggests potential areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The forms include required fields and consent checkboxes, but additional anti-bot measures could strengthen input security. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be beneficial for transparency and security maturity. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with standard security best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Add CAPTCHA or similar anti-bot mechanisms on forms to prevent automated abuse.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Besqab
Registration number
556699-1088
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Besqab
Description
Besqab utvecklar hållbara bostäder av hög kvalitet i attraktiva områden i Storstockholm och Uppsala.
Key services
Development of sustainable housing, Sales of apartments and small houses, Offering housing-related community properties
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, CookieInformation.com consent management, Lime Technologies forms, Vue.js components (vue-simple-suggest), Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome icons
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Marketing Platform, Facebook, LinkedIn
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Lime Technologies forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels
  4. Use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. No visible security policy or incident response page
  7. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including Google Maps API for interactive maps, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and CookieInformation.com for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The front-end leverages Bootstrap for responsive design and Vue.js components for enhanced UI elements. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred analytics. The site structure and meta tags support SEO best practices. No CMS is explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arosbostad.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arosbostad.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.