Skip to main content

Security report for armakskeri.lv

Biedrība “Ar Makšķeri” · Non-profit · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

65/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biedrība “Ar Makšķeri” is a non-profit association focused on the fishing community, likely in Latvia. The website serves as a digital presence for the association, targeting fishing enthusiasts and community members. The site is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. However, the content is minimal and appears to be under maintenance or placeholder, limiting user engagement and information availability. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in content richness, privacy compliance, and security best practices to enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching armakskeri.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in the non-profit sector, serving a niche market of fishing enthusiasts in Latvia. Its business model revolves around community engagement and possibly organizing fishing-related events or activities. The website's limited content and lack of detailed business information suggest a small-scale operation. The use of modern frameworks and Google Analytics indicates some level of digital maturity. However, the lack of contact details and privacy policies may hinder user trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential may depend on expanding content, improving transparency, and enhancing user interaction.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no exposed sensitive data in the HTML, and no known vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and incident management to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība “Ar Makšķeri”
Description
The website represents a non-profit association named “Ar Makšķeri” which translates as 'With a Fishing Rod'. The site appears to be related to sport fishing or a fishing community.
Key services
Community engagement, Sport fishing events or information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found in the HTML content.
  4. No explicit contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. Website uses modern React and Next.js framework with Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled.
  7. Content is minimal and mostly a placeholder or under maintenance message.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging server-side rendering and client-side hydration. It uses multiple JavaScript chunks and CSS files for modular loading. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The site lacks some security best practices such as security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is contemporary but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with armakskeri.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review armakskeri.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.