Skip to main content

Security report for arik.lv

SIA Arik · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Arik is a Latvian small business specializing in the manufacturing and retail of wooden construction materials and garden furniture, including portable saunas, camping houses, and various outdoor wooden products. The company targets consumers and businesses within Latvia seeking quality wooden products for home and garden use. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and common plugins, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for compliance and protection. The absence of WHOIS data limits full trust verification, but the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with clear contact information and social media presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arik.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors focused on wooden products and garden furniture. Its business model combines production and direct sales, targeting local Latvian markets. The website indicates a stable presence with a range of product offerings and a partnership with JM Holding for website development. The lack of detailed company registration data and certifications suggests a small-scale operation. The company maintains active social media channels and provides phone contact numbers, supporting customer engagement. Growth opportunities could include enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks several critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited security maturity. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but regular updates and security hardening are advised to maintain a secure posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Arik
Description
SIA Arik is a Latvian company specializing in the production and sale of wooden materials and garden furniture, including gazebos, canopies, camping houses, frame houses, saunas, logs, and pools.
Key services
Production and sale of portable saunas, Children's playgrounds, Sheds and storage buildings, Home furniture, Gazebos and canopies, Camping houses, Tables and benches, Dog pens, Pools, Polypropylene products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Photo Gallery plugin, Contact Form 7, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via ShareThis integration)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  4. Contact information includes phone numbers and social media links.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and common plugins.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. Content is relevant and professional for a small Latvian business.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses several plugins including Contact Form 7 and Photo Gallery. It loads Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons, and integrates ShareThis for social sharing and analytics. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness but could improve accessibility and SEO optimization. No advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The technical stack is standard for small business websites, with opportunities to improve security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arik.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arik.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.