Skip to main content

Security report for arhitektiargali.lv

ARHITEKTI ĀRGAĻI · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARHITEKTI ĀRGAĻI is a Latvian architectural firm specializing in the design, planning, and renovation of private houses and public buildings. The website showcases a portfolio of projects including facade renovations and new constructions, targeting clients seeking professional architectural services. The firm appears to be a small-sized business operating primarily in the real estate sector within Latvia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder and includes anti-spam and bot detection mechanisms via CleanTalk. The site is mobile-optimized with moderate performance and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is decent with HTTPS enabled and anti-spam protections, but lacks important security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and safe but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arhitektiargali.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized architectural service provider with a focus on both private and public sector projects. Its business model revolves around project-based architectural design and renovation services. The website content and portfolio suggest a stable market presence in Latvia's architectural sector, targeting property owners and developers. The absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits transparency. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The firm uses standard WordPress infrastructure with common plugins, indicating moderate digital maturity. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving online trust signals and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and uses CleanTalk anti-spam and bot detection scripts, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR requirements. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links and consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARHITEKTI ĀRGAĻI
Description
Architectural office specializing in private houses, public building design, planning, and renovation.
Key services
Private house design, Public building design, Planning, Renovation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, WPBakery Page Builder, CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Bot detection scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based architectural firm site with portfolio projects.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Uses CleanTalk anti-spam and bot detection scripts.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with valid SSL certificates.
  7. No social media links or business certifications visible.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to architecture and renovation.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with WPBakery Page Builder and uses jQuery and Bootstrap libraries. It integrates CleanTalk anti-spam and bot detection services. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO meta tags are present but could be enhanced. No advanced analytics or marketing tools were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arhitektiargali.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arhitektiargali.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.