Skip to main content

Security report for arhitekt.lv

SIA Arhitekt · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Arhitekt is a well-established architectural firm based in Latvia, specializing in family house projects with over 17 years of experience. The company offers a comprehensive range of architectural services including individual house designs, building approvals, reconstruction, and legalizations. Their market position is supported by client testimonials, certifications, and partnerships with industry experts. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent, and reCAPTCHA integration, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business credibility is high, supported by professional content and clear contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arhitekt.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets individuals and families in Latvia seeking architectural services for private homes. Their business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on client satisfaction and project quality. The firm leverages partnerships with construction material suppliers and local authorities to streamline project approvals. The website reflects a mature digital presence with SEO and analytics tools, indicating a focus on growth and customer engagement. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but does not detract from the visible professionalism and market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS, GDPR compliance, and use of security plugins like reCAPTCHA. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as HSTS and CSP suggests room for improvement. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, which is common for small service providers but could be enhanced to improve trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but should be regularly reviewed.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
  5. Monitor and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for privacy compliance and performance impact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Arhitekt
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Arhitekt
Description
SIA Arhitekt is a certified architectural office specializing in family house projects with over 17 years of experience in Latvia. They offer private house design, project coordination, and architectural consultations.
Key services
individual house projects, first group buildings documentation and approval, existing house reconstruction and extension, house commissioning and legalizations, apartment remodeling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrica, Hotjar, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Codevz Plus plugin, Z500 Projects Importer plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrica, Hotjar
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional architectural services focused on family homes
  3. Strong presence of GDPR and cookie compliance
  4. Multiple tracking and analytics tools integrated
  5. No visible security or privacy red flags in content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Complianz GDPR for cookie management. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrica, and Hotjar. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery. Performance is moderate, with some heavy video backgrounds and multiple external scripts that could impact load times. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized service websites, with opportunities to optimize loading and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arhitekt.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arhitekt.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.