Skip to main content

Security report for architektas.lt

UAB Architektas LT · Real Estate · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Architektas LT is a Lithuanian architecture studio founded in 2007 by Simonas Talandzevičius and Mindaugas Leliūga. The company specializes in designing public, commercial, residential buildings, and interiors, including individual homes. The firm emphasizes close collaboration with clients to deliver functional, comfortable, and long-lasting architectural solutions. Their market position is that of a small, specialized studio with a personalized approach to projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional portfolio and team information. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could enhance compliance and security posture to reduce risk and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching architektas.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention architektas.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
21
Weak passwords
14%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for architektas.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on architectural design services. Their business model is service-based, targeting clients needing architectural and interior design for various building types. The firm leverages a small team to maintain close client relationships and ensure project quality. Their portfolio showcases diverse projects, enhancing credibility. The presence on social media platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram supports marketing and client engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact details support legitimacy. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears stable with a clear niche and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected in the HTML, but Contact Form 7 is present, suggesting contact forms exist elsewhere. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish incident response and security policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Architektas LT
Description
Architektūros studija įkurta 2007 metais, projektuojanti visuomeninius, komercinius, daugiabučius gyvenamuosius pastatus bei interjerus, taip pat individualius namus ir interjerus. Komanda vertina glaudų ryšį su užsakovu ir siekia kurti funkcionalią, patogią ir ilgalaikę architektūrą.
Key services
Visuomeninių pastatų projektavimas, Komercinių pastatų projektavimas, Daugiabučių gyvenamųjų pastatų projektavimas, Individualių namų projektavimas, Interjerų projektavimas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Customer Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain emails and phone numbers.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and sliders.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram is linked.
  8. No forms with personal data collection fields detected except Contact Form 7 scripts (no form HTML found).
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and popular slider plugins. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing images and scripts. Accessibility is basic, with room for enhancements such as ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation. SEO is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with architektas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review architektas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.