Skip to main content

Security report for architect.lv

SIA "Arhitekts Muižzemnieks" · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Arhitekts Muižzemnieks" is a small Latvian architectural firm established in 2005, offering comprehensive architectural services including building design, restoration, and fire safety assessments. The company targets clients requiring professional architectural expertise in residential, public, and industrial sectors. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence with multilingual support, clear contact information, and integration of modern web technologies such as service workers and analytics tools. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is evident with a GDPR-aligned privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the firm presents a professional and trustworthy online presence suitable for its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching architect.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds relevant certifications (LAS and BVKB) and showcases a portfolio of realized projects, indicating established market presence. The business model focuses on architectural design and consulting services, with a clear emphasis on quality and compliance. Partnerships with local platforms and a professional website developer indicate a stable ecosystem. The firm appears to maintain good client communication channels and transparent business information, supporting credibility and growth potential within the Latvian architectural sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form to mitigate spam. Service workers are registered, enhancing performance and offline capabilities. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not provided, which could be improved to enhance security readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) for business and contact information to improve SEO and trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Arhitekts Muižzemnieks”
Registration number
40003738721
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Arhitekts Muižzemnieks"
Description
Būvprojektu ekspertīze; Dzīvojamo, publisko un ražošanas ēku projektēšana. Arhitektūras pieminekļu arhitektoniskā izpēte. Ugunsdrošības pasākumu pārskats. Restaurācijas projektēšana.
Key services
Būvprojektu ekspertīze, Ēku un būvju apsekošana, Būvuzraudzība, Savrupmāju un dzīvokļu projektēšana, Dzīvojamo, sabiedrisko un ražošanas ēku projektēšana, Arhitektūras pieminekļu arhitektoniski-mākslinieciskā izpēte, Arhitektūras pieminekļu restaurācijas projektēšana, Teritoriju labiekārtojuma un apzaļumošanas projektēšana, Teritoriju detālplānojumu projektēšana, Ēku būvkonstrukciju projektēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Flexslider, Skrollr, Google reCAPTCHA, Mapbox, Service Worker (PWA support)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. Professional architectural services firm based in Latvia.
  3. Clear contact information and embedded Google Maps location.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is used.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Duda platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flexslider, and Skrollr for UI effects. It integrates Google Analytics and Snowplow for user behavior tracking and employs service workers for PWA capabilities. The site loads resources from a CDN, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility is basic and could be enhanced. The site performs moderately well but could benefit from performance optimizations and additional technical SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with architect.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review architect.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.